Utah Native Plant Society

After subscribing, whitelist noreply@follow.it. The posts contained herein are intended to be informational, and any opinions expressed are mine alone.

Monday, July 27, 2026

Native plants and friends in the news

Sego Lily:

https://thursd.com/articles/utah-state-flower

(while this is the Utah state flower, it enjoys no legal protection)

(the "pink" Sego Lily pictured in the article above is treated by some as Calochortus ciscoensis - see additional picture below; flowers have a reduced chevron or none at all with long, flexible, drooping leaves that remain persistent at the time of flowering; flowers can be pink or white)

Wildflower Festival:

https://dailyutahchronicle.com/2026/07/14/the-utah-wildflower-festival-celebrates-its-30th-anniversary/

Wild About Utah post:

https://www.upr.org/show/wild-about-utah/2026-07-20/wild-about-utah-natures-monuments

Upcoming community events:

https://unofficialnetworks.com/2026/07/17/looking-to-help-to-keep-utahs-mountains-beautiful-heres-a-list-of-upcoming-community-events/

Hummingbird event:

https://www.moabtimes.com/articles/see-hummingbirds-up-close-at-upcoming-banding-event-in-northeastern-utah/

Native plants in the landscape:

https://www.thenewsherald.com/2026/07/11/once-dismissed-as-weeds-native-plants-are-now-flying-off-the-shelves/



Cisco Sego Lily
Cisco Sego Lily (Calochortus ciscoensis)
(flowers can be white or pink; note the reduced chevron and the long, drooping ,flexible leaves)


Tuesday, July 14, 2026

The fight over GSENM and Bears Ears will go on

https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2026/07/13/president-trump-shrinks-bears-ears/

(with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse standing behind the feared leader of the Oompa-Loompas)

https://www.fox13now.com/news/politics/trump-shrinks-bears-ears-grand-staircase-escalante-national-monuments-again

(includes short video from Jackie Grant, Executive Director for Grand Staircase Escalante Partners and a board member for the Utah Native Plant Society; note that this action was expected)

Other links of interest:

https://suwa.org/trump-illegally-decimates-bears-ears-and-grand-staircase-escalante/

https://suwa.org/suwa-statement-on-trumps-illegal-reductions-of-grand-staircase-escalante-bears-ears-national-monuments-7-13-26/

https://suwa.org/suwa-statement-on-tenth-circuit-decision-over-long-running-attack-on-national-monuments-6-23-26/

https://nativenewsonline.net/environment/timeline-grand-staircase-escalante-and-the-fight-over-utahs-national-monuments/

(no contact was made with Tribal Nations re: Bears Ears)

https://earthjustice.org/press/2026/report-trump-administration-to-illegally-attack-bears-ears-and-grand-staircase-escalante-national-monuments

There already was significant litigation in the works.  There is a good chance this will remain tied up in the courts for the duration of the current presidency.

A tremendous amount of misinformation has been put out by the White House and Utah congressional  representatives ("we the people" have not been fairly represented).  The land was never stolen from the people of Utah and it remains in federal ownership.  Hunting and cattle grazing were already being allowed.


Bears Ears (April 2017)




Saturday, July 11, 2026

Rolling back the ESA's regulatory definition of the word "harm"

See:

https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/trump-administration-kills-protections-for-endangered-wildlife-habitat-2026-07-10/

Comments:

The word "harm" was not specifically defined in the Endangered Species Act but was used in defining the word "take" to  mean "harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect."

It became settled law that the word "harm" in the context of the Endangered Species Act regulations (again with reference to the "take" provisions) included habitat modification and destruction.  Federal regulations have (until now) defined "harm" to include "significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife."    

But no doubt as a result of Trump administration goals to open up areas for logging and mining, the US Fish & Wildlife Service has now, some 30 years later, decided to follow a minority dissenting opinion made in 1995 by conservative Justice Scalia (who was joined by Thomas and one other), that the word "harm" does not in fact mean negatively impacting listed species habitats.  

The Service claims that this change is unrelated to critical habitat provisions afforded under the Act and that existing critical habitat designations will not change (yet many listed species do not have critical habitat designations and the protection those provide do not in any event exclude development and degradation of those habitats.). 

Some 358,000 comments were submitted in response to a 30 day only comment period that  was deemed to be a sufficient amount of time for the public to be notified and make those responses.

Now the word "harm" has no specific regulatory meaning.   Rescinding the regulatory definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act that has just been published involves some highly contorted logic.  And, exactly what this means when it comes to plants is not  yet clear.

EarthJustice is reportedly planning to fight this change in court since there is no legal or scientific basis to support the position that the Service has now taken.   Given now the even more "conservative" nature of the Supreme Court, chances of success are probably low.  

Congressional action ultimately may be required.


See also:  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/10/epa-rollback-endangered-habitats-logging-mining






Monday, May 4, 2026

Trump EPA gaslighting on air pollution

While the Trump administration advocates for fossil fuels, they want to blame Asia now for Salt Lake City's (and Phoenix's) air pollution problems (and so want to cut those cities some slack in terms of regulatory impacts):

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/30/climate/phoenix-salt-lake-city-pollution-epa.html

This is of course insanity and propaganda by the current administration (which does not believe in science nor facts).

The causes of pollution along the Wasatch Front (where Salt Lake City is situated) are well known.

Just a few resources to respond to this ridiculous EPA claim:


https://cwc.utah.gov/smog-lake-city-the-history-of-utahs-poor-air-quality/

https://www.sltrib.com/news/2023/11/14/reaching-air-how-historic-mistake/

https://www.slc.gov/sustainability/air-quality/





Friday, April 10, 2026

Pikas, Mountain Goats, and Global Warming

The American Pika may represent the "canary in a coal mine" for climate change impacts, and their plight should not be ignored.  See this recent story:

https://www.kuer.org/science-environment/2026-04-08/these-fuzzy-alpine-animals-are-feeling-the-heat-of-utahs-hot-dry-winter

As also indicated in this article:

"Other research has begun studying the effects of mountain goat grazing on pika habitat, too. Goats aren’t native to the La Sals, but the state introduced them there starting in 2013. Some environmental groups have argued that adding mountain goats threatens the fragile alpine ecosystem."

The Utah Native Plant Society has been one of those "environmental" groups opposed to these non-native mountain goat introductions. But the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources remains committed to introducing them where they don't belong throughout the state.

The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as well as the state of California have failed to conclude that any of the subspecies of the America Pika are eligible for listing under federal and state laws.  The original American Pika ESA (Endangered Species Act) petition was filed over 15 years ago.

The conclusion reached in 2010 by the USFWS (see link below) that these animals were not likely in danger of extinction or likely to be become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout all of a significant portion of the range was in my opinion flawed. There is always a lack of data but at some point you have to act in the best interest of the species and not just push decisions down the road when we know that worldwide temperatures are increasing every year and faster than expected and that the human influence on global warming is only getting worse year after year.  And until human populations stabilize and given now also extreme anti-environmental policies, species decline and likelihood of extinctions should be obvious.

Here is the USFWS 2010 decision concluding that none of the subspecies were eligible for listing:

https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/federal_register_document/2010-2405.pdf

See also:

https://www.aspentimes.com/news/federal-agency-denies-protections-for-tiny-pika/

https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/American_pika/action_timeline.html

However, very recent research is again indicating that they are in fact at potentially severe  and imminent risk:

https://www.colorado.edu/today/2025/11/18/new-pika-research-finds-troubling-signs-iconic-rocky-mountain-animal

Ochotona princeps subsp. uinta which is only known to occur in Utah (Wasatch Range and Uinta Mtns - has still not being ranked to Utah) and Wyoming (S1 NatureServe rank)

https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.898829/Ochotona_princeps_uinta

Subsp. uinta as well as subsp. schisticeps should have been listed in 2010.  

The current T4 rank makes little sense with respect to subsp. schisticeps, also with no NatureServe rank for Utah:

https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.895817/Ochotona_princeps_sch

See comments below regarding subsp. saxatillis which should also be receiving conservation attention; these subspecies need priority attention or they may be lost.


Pictures and more information

 

Ochotona princeps subsp. princeps (Wasatch range) Sept. 2014
(photo by Tony Frates)

The five subspecies of the American Pika:

Journal of Mammalogy, Volume 91, Issue 2, 16 April 2010, Pages 401–417,
https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-277.1




Four of the five subspecies occur in Utah:

Subsp. princeps -  occurs in the Wasatch Range and overall occupies the northern portion of the range of the species.   Has a brighter, more rusty-brown or cinnamon color in summer.

Subsp. schisticeps  - occurs in Great Basin.  Has grayish markings in its summer fur and less cinnamon tones.  Adapted to drier habitats.

Subsp uinta -  occurs in the Uinta Mountains and Wasatch Range.  Intermediate in size and color as compared to the coastal (dark) and southern Rocky Mountain (light) subspecies. 

Subsp saxatilis - only occurs in Utah in the La Sal  Mountains where it is disjunct from where it occurs in Colorado and New Mexico.  Generally larger than the other subspecies  and lighter in color (more grayish and light brown).   This subspecies should have a high priority conservation status in Utah given its sparse distribution and the impacts of global warming and introduced mountain goats.   While this subspecies has been considered as secure in Colorado, recent research as noted previously suggests that it may in be fact in decline.  More information:



While NatureServe currently ranks the species as a whole as  S4 for Utah, all of the subspecies are SNR (not ranked) which doesn't make much sense.

Why isn't the Utah DWR giving these subspecies more attention?  They should all have state NatureServe ranks.












Tuesday, October 21, 2025

Utah roadless areas need protection


In light of the attacks on the environment coming out of Washington DC, here is an older article that discusses the importance of roadless areas in support of biodiversity, specifically referring to Utah:

https://www.hcn.org/articles/utah-biodiversity-thrives-in-utahs-roadless-areas-rollback-threatens-at-risk/

The article in turn references this report which concluded that roadless protections are crucial to sustaining the health and diversity of more than 100 at-risk species.  Yet the state of Utah was at that time fighting to reduce the restrictions into those protected areas. 

Potential impacts to the Ashley National Forest in Utah are of particular concern in this latest misguided effort to increase logging in our forests.

Old and older growth forests have largely already been decimated in the U.S. and need protection, not roads and logging.  This will not "fix our forests."   It is estimated that only a very few remnant old-growth forests remaining the United States (less than 1% in the East and 5% in the West (see Why old-growth forests?).

The current administration shuns science and in fact seems to instead revile it.  You can't use "common sense" (even if that normally even applies to you which it doesn't to our current  administration) to figure these things out and take appropriate management action.  Not understanding climate change (which is real) and instead referring to it as a "hoax" is code for avoiding the truth.  And the truth can be inconvenient, but it is still the truth.





Saturday, May 24, 2025

NPS's I&M division on the DOGE chopping block

The National Park Service's (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring Division (I&M) is headed for a DOGE reduction or elimination in its entirety.

The I&M division provides scientific data that is critical for park management.  It helps to ensure that the parks remain healthy and are meeting their conservation objectives.

This May 2025 article concerning the federally listed Navajo Sedge (Carex specuicola):

https://www.nps.gov/articles/protecting-navajo-sedge-in-natural-bridges.htm

was authored by an I&M research scientist and the related work was done by experienced I&M staffers along with Natural Bridges National Monument staff.

More about the I&M division:

https://www.nps.gov/im/index.htm

DOGE has been illegally in control of the NPS since April of 2025.

Related articles:

Elon Musk's DOGE is now running America's national parks (April 21, 2025)

https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/doge-running-national-parks-20287023.php

DOGE now in control of the National Park Service (April 23,2025):

https://www.travelpulse.com/news/impacting-travel/doge-now-in-control-of-the-national-park-service-what-we-know

DOGE Is Now in Charge of U.S. National Parks (April 24, 2025)

https://www.fodors.com/news/news/national-parks-will-now-be-run-by-elon-musks-doge

Navajo Sedge information

Utah Rare Plants website:

https://www.utahrareplants.org/pdf/Carex_specuicola.pdf

ECOS:

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8579


























Friday, May 23, 2025

Provo recognizes the critical importance of native pollinators

Provo is the first city in Utah to join the Bee City USA initiative which focuses on native pollinator  education and conservation.

BYU student newspaper article:

https://universe.byu.edu/metro/provo-joins-bee-city-usa-as-first-in-utah-to-boost-pollinator-conservation


More information

Bee City USA (an initiative of the Xerces Society) website:

https://beecityusa.org/

Xerces website:

https://xerces.org/

Related:  

Project 1100 (based in Utah) website:

https://www.projectelevenhundred.org/


Note: Project 1100 is named in honor of the some 1100 species of native bees found so far in Utah.  While Utah is known as the "honeybee state" and has a state flag that utilizes a fanciful beehive graphic, honeybees are not native bees and hive placement (among other impacts) can have a seriously negative impact on our native bees. Utah's native flora (which includes some 3,000 vascular plant species alone) evolved alongside native bees (and other pollinators, but bees typically have been the most significant) and not honeybees.   And without plants, we would not exist.


Wednesday, May 21, 2025

ESA protection for two Joshua Tree species required to be reanalyzed

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has been ordered to reanalyze climate change threats to  the Western and Eastern Joshua Tree species.  Endangered Species Act (ESA) designations as threatened species was previously denied.

Related links:

https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2025/05/15/joshua-tree-protection-ruling/83658422007/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/federal-court-rules-attempt-withhold-endangered-species-act/story?id=121792589

https://wildearthguardians.org/press-releases/federal-court-sides-with-conservationists-joshua-tree-analysis-unlawfully-sidesteps-climate-science/

https://wildearthguardians.org/brave-new-wild/where-we-work/arizona/inside-the-courtroom-legal-fellow-casey-bage-wins-for-wildlife/

"The court emphasized the need for the FWS to adequately address the threats posed by climate change, including prolonged droughts, increasing fire, and habitat loss, to the Joshua tree."

There are two separate species involved.  The species that occurs in the southwestern corner of Utah is the Eastern Joshua Tree, Yucca jaegeriana, and not Yucca brevifolia (which does not actually occur in Utah as was historically thought).  In Utah Y. jaegeriana is considered to be criticially imperiled (S1) at the NatureServe state ranking level.   The two species may appear superficially to be similar in appearance but they have different growth habits, different leaf lengths, different pollinators, and different fruit and flower morphologies.  Y. jaegeriana is for example generally not as tall and is branched compared to the taller, unbranched Y. brevifolia.  

Y. jaegeriana in Utah solely occurs in Washington County extending to western Arizona and  then from southeastern to southwestern Nevada and then slipping just over the border into southeastern California.  Y. brevifolia also occurs in Nevada but farther to north in southwestern Nevada and then extending more into the interior of southeastern California.  While there is an area where they meet, they are mostly not sympatric.

Both species are highly threatened by climate change, wildfires, habitat loss and invasive species.


Some journal references and related links:

Recognition of Y. jaegeriana as a species in 2007:

https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1050&context=aliso#:~:text=Yucca%20brevifolia%20s.s.%20is%20arborescent,5).

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1266892/full

In July of 2023 California passed the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act to conserve western Joshua tree and its habitat 

https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Environmental-Review/WJT


Yucca jaegeriana in Mohave Co AZ 4/25/1986 (Tony Frates photo)











Saturday, February 24, 2024

Honey bee apiaries on public lands and in natural areas

Some references relating to concerns about honey bees especially when apiaries are placed on public lands or in/near natural areas follow:

Commercial honeybees threaten to displace Utah’s native bees

Nick Bowlin March 7, 2019, High Country News

https://www.hcn.org/issues/51-5/public-lands-commercial-honeybees-threaten-to-displace-utahs-native-bees-pesticides/


Fighting for Flowers: Native Bee Conservation and the Dangers of Honeybee Permitting on Public Lands 

Thomas Meinzen, Grand Canyon Trust, March 2020 presentation

https://www.unps.org/miscpdf/MeinzenProtectBeesMarch2020.pdf


Will Putting Honey Bees on Public Lands Threaten Native Bees?

https://e360.yale.edu/features/will-putting-honey-bees-on-public-lands-threaten-native-bees

by Jennifer Oldhamd, September 15, 2020, Yale Environment 360 (published by the Yale School of the Environment)

Article quotations:

As suitable sites become scarce, commercial beekeepers are increasingly moving their hives to U.S. public lands. But scientists warn that the millions of introduced honey bees pose a risk to native species, outcompeting them for pollen and altering fragile plant communities.

“There are no feral honey bees in Utah — the winters are too long and cold,” Cane said. “This is essentially the most intact native bee fauna in the U.S. It’s worth protecting.”

 

Environmental groups want to block honeybees from Utah’s national forests

By Brian Maffly,  Aug. 23, 2020, Salt Lake Tribune

https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2020/08/23/environmental-groups-want/

 

Investigating Imperiled Bumble Bee Species Distributions and Habitat Associations

Oct 1, 2023  to Jan 30, 2026, USDA Research Project:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/project/?accnNo=445663

Bumble bees are critically important pollinators for wild plants and agricultural crop production, but are declining globally. Bumble bee population declines have been attributed to several interacting stressors, including land-use alteration and climate change. 


Project 1100 

Various articles from 2019 to 2021 including:

Why Honey Bee Apiaries Should Never Be Permitted On National Public Lands by Vincent Tepedino (2019).

https://www.projectelevenhundred.org/the-science


Xerces

An Overview of the Potential Impacts of Honey Bees to Native Bees, Plant Communities, and Ecosystems in Wild Landscapes:  Recommendations for Land Managers

https://xerces.org/sites/default/files/2018-06/16-067_02_Overview%20of%20the%20Potential%20Impacts%20of%20Honey%20Bees_web.pdf

Comment: contains many recommendations with respect to the placement of apiaries on public lands and natural areas.

Citation:

Hatfield, R. G., S. Jepsen, M.Vaughan, S. Black, E. LeeMäder. 2018. An Overview of the Potential Impacts of Honey Bees to Native Bees, Plant Communities, and Ecosystems in Wild Landscapes: Recommendations for Land Managers. 12 pp. Portland, OR: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation.

Want To Save The Bees? Focus On Habitat, Not Honey Bees

By Rich Hatfield and Matthew Shepherd on 6. July 2023

https://xerces.org/blog/want-to-save-bees-focus-on-habitat-not-honey-bees


Honey Bees in North America: Why Getting a Hive Won’t “Save the Bees”

by Rich Hatfield and Matthew  Shepherd (Xerces), 2023

https://xerces.org/sites/default/files/publications/22-011.pdf



 




Wednesday, February 21, 2024

Why preserve the natural world?

This question is closely related to the "Why care?" question that arises when talking about why we should avoid causing plant species to become extinct.

How about this:  We exist because of plants.  The very air that we breathe is because of plants.  They sustain us and shelter us.  Yet we give them so very little respect.

A February 15, 2024 World Economic Forum report provides even more logical reasons such as:  half of the world's GDP is dependent on nature.   Yet we are likely losing species due to rapid habitat loss without even realizing it.  Kew estimates that there may be as many as 100,000 unnamed plant species over and above the roughly 400,000 that are known.

Preserving the natural world is critical to our very survival as well as our economic well-being. It should be our highest priority.  Without it, we have nothing.






Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Valley fever spread is a reflection of global warming

In 2021, a University of Utah Health article noted that "Valley Fever," a fungal disease more commonly associated with California and Arizona might in fact be more common in Utah than has been thought:

https://healthcare.utah.edu/press-releases/2021/09/valley-fever-more-common-utah-previously-thought-researchers-find

From the article:

"Valley Fever is caused by Coccidioides, a fungus that can infect the lungs. The fungus lives in the soil but becomes airborne when dust is disturbed, such as by construction or high winds. If people inhale that dust, they can become infected, but the disease isn't contagious from person to person."

"With climate change, temperatures are increasing," says Adrienne Carey, M.D., infectious disease specialist at U of U Health. "With increased temperatures and drier conditions, the map will change, and it should probably be expected to spread northward. Aside from a highly publicized outbreak in 2001 at Dinosaur National Monument, there really is a lack of data about how common Valley Fever is within the state of Utah."

"The team identified 364 cases of Valley Fever that occurred between 2009-2015 and met the research criteria for "proven" or "probable" Coccidioides infection."

"Interestingly, one of the fastest-growing cities in the United States, St. George, is in southwestern Utah," Carey points out. "With the rapid growth of construction that's occurring, there's increased risk for people to come in contact with the fungus."

"People who are potentially vulnerable might consider wearing masks to protect themselves from inhaling the fungus spores, particularly in dusty or windy conditions or while participating in outdoor recreation."

A more recent NBC health news article published in January of 2023 projects that the disease may present throughout the entire western US over the next 70 years.  Maps contained in the article show its current presence in Utah:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/valley-fever-historically-found-only-southwest-spreading-can-devastati-rcna64313

This article further reinforces that Valley fever cases are on the rise and will likely continue to worsen as a result of "climate change."







Saturday, December 30, 2023

UDWR acknowledges the importance of the ESA but also wants police to kill urban deer

Importance of the Endangered Species Act acknowledged by UDWR:

The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) has been devoting itself to delisting plant (and animal) species formally listed under the very important Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) and has not ever to my knowledge ever supported new listings. Quite the reverse.

Yet in a news report piece published on December 27, 2023 with respect to the 50th anniversary of the ESA, a UDWR representative acknowledges that the Act has  "has prevented the extinction of hundreds of [imperiled] species" and that it has also helped "promote the recovery of many species that were near extinction."

This is a great but is also a rather shocking acknowledgment by an agency that has done nothing but pushback against and complain about the ESA, and that has embarked on an ambitious statewide program of introducing non-native mountain goats that are negatively impacting high-elevation ecosystems, and an agency that has traditionally opposed the protection of wolves despite the science that indicates the very important role they play.

The piece goes on to mention the 17 wildlife species currently listed under the ESA that occur in Utah.  Yet there is no mention of the currently 25 listed plant species that also occur in Utah.  The importance of plant species in general is never given the attention that they deserve.  We would not exist without them, nor would any wildlife.  Healthy and diverse ecosystems rely on healthy native plant populations.

Related stories re: the 50th anniversary of the ESA:

https://www.upr.org/2023-12-24/the-endangered-species-act-turns-50

https://www.upr.org/2023-12-24/the-santa-cruz-island-dudleya-is-an-endangered-species-act-success-story

https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/publications/earthonline/endangered-earth-online-no1225.html

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/01/02/2023-28935/50th-anniversary-of-the-endangered-species-act-2023

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/money-endangered-species-goes-small-number-creatures-leaving-others-li-rcna131680

(this last reference discusses the plight of plants that are typically short-changed)


UDWR and urban deer:

As a curiosity completely unrelated to the above, the same UDWR representative on the same date and in another news report indicates that the UDWR has "authorized" city police to "cull" urban deer.  So much for the sanctity of wildlife.  We are living in their habitat, not the other way around.  If they are bothering someone's flower garden (but in winter, they are just looking for something to browse, mainly grass) that really doesn't justify killing them.  That they can cause accidents is true but normally that is because drivers tend to drive too fast and don't pay attention. Somehow we do have to find a way to live with the natural world and not do what we do best (i.e. kill anything that moves, and destroy natural open spaces).  That we have failed to give them corridors to areas where they should be able to freely roam in an attempt to survive is our fault, not theirs. There is also considerable concern about the risk of someone being shot with a bullet or an arrow while attempts are made to cull herds.  Police officers are not trained wildlife hunters or trappers.  City police should not take on this responsibility that UDWR has "authorized" (which likely also exceeds UDWR's authority).







Friday, December 22, 2023

Idaho dam proposal threatens the Great Salt Lake

Pacificorp's newly proposed dam in the Oneida Narrows will likely negatively impact the already beleaguered Great Salt Lake:

The Bear River is the major source of water for the Great Salt Lake (and its ecosystems) which of course is already in serious trouble.  This proposed dam would be the second dam on this section of the river.

While the project location is in Idaho, Utahns need to weigh in on yet another ill-advised dam that will likely have serious downstream consequences.  Dams are short-lived and create ecological collapse.  It is exactly these types of projects that have contributed to the shrinking of the Great Salt Lake, the ultimate loss of which would have devastating human health as well as disastrous environmental consequences for wildlife and related native plant ecosystems.

Comments are due by December 26.

Project background information:

https://www.idahostatejournal.com/community/public-comment-sought-on-proposal-for-new-oneida-narrows-dam-input-due-dec-26/article_dc86c271-fba8-59a3-b6e2-f390519fba9c.html

https://www.pacificorp.com/energy/storage/oneida.html

Friends of Great Salt Lake newsletter (see page 16):

https://www.fogsl.org/newsroom/newsletters/74-2023-winter/file


Advocacy group opposing this project:

https://www.oneidanarrows.org/

Their petition:

https://chng.it/BM465s8Qvz


Ferc comment link:

https://www.ferc.gov/how-file-comment


 




Saturday, April 22, 2023

Stone's draba finally officially recognized as new to science

A plant species previously named in 1941 in honor of the late Dr. Bassett Maguire (botany professor at herbarium curator at Utah State University in Logan, Utah from 1931 until 1942 and then a curator and scientist at the New York Botanic Garden until his death in 1991) now once again is being recognized as having two infraspecific taxa based on recently published genetic studies (March 2023).

Plant species aren't necessarily named for the first person to make a plant collection of that ultimately named species.  But in this case, Dr. Maguire along with Dean Hobson and Ralph Gierisch on June 2, 1936 made a high elevation collection in Cache County in the Bear River Range that they knew was a species of Draba in the mustard family, but without identification of the species within that genus:


Maguire 13687 deposited at the Gray Herbarium (Harvard University) subsp. maguirei

The genus Draba is sometimes referred to as "Whitlow grass" and other related variations but it is not a grass species.

In 1941, C.L. Hitchcock named this plant as a new species, Draba maguirei, with two intraspecific varieties: var. maguirei and var. burkei.

On July 7, 1995, Doug Stone with Frank "Buddy" Smith made a collection of a plant in the Monte Cristo Range similar to D. maguirei at an elevation that was 1800 feet lower then the 1936 collection and brought it to the attention of mustard expert Dr. Michael Windham:


Stone 1804 of subsp. stonei (note the premature var. designation and author names)

Windham collected it in 1997:


Windham 97-118 subsp. stonei (note the premature var. designation and author names)

This same plant, as it turns outs, was collected by the USU's Dr. Richard Shaw in June of 1983.

Shaw 3132 subsp. stonei (with a handwritten premature var. designation and author names)


Since var. stonei was never published (until published as subsp. stonei in March of 2023), the annotations of the name to the specimens above was premature; it was based on the same understanding of research that had already been largely conducted in the late 1990's, and sometimes specimen sheets make reference to unpublished or expected names.  But, often there never is a publication of that name.  The naming of a species however requires a publication that meets the minimum threshold requirements of the ICBN (International Code of Botanical Nomenclature).  Just writing a proposed name on a herbarium specimen sheet (or "voucher") does not constitute a publication.

In May of 1999, USU's Dr. Mary Barkworth collected this later named taxon in Logan Canyon:

Barkworth 99.010 subsp. stonei at NYBG

Botanists Duane Atwood and Joel Tuhy separately also collected this same lower elevation plant in the 1980's before being described now as Draba maguirei C.L. Hitchc. subsp. stonei Windham via the recent publication.  Until now, those plants (as well as those referenced above) have simply been classified as Draba maguirei var. maguirei.

Based on chromosome counts and analysis provided in a 2004 paper , Windham and Beilstein moved Draba burkei, previously named as a variety of D. maguirei, to the species level. 

Oldest Draba burkei collection (May 1932, Box Elder Co.) by Melvin Burke (holotype)

It was thought that an analysis of plants still considered to be D. maguirei other than "burkei" was going to be made by 2005 based on initial conferences that I participated in relating to the Utah Rare Plant Guide (URPG) project.  Preparations were being made going back as far 2003 to add "var." stonei to the URPG (with the same author assumptions, i.e. by Windham and Beilstein) but those efforts then were paused awaiting a future publication, which in 2023 has now finally happened.  

Link to the publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36779544/Full PDF.  Citation:

Windham MD, Picard KT, Pryer KM. 2023. An in-depth investigation of cryptic taxonomic diversity in the rare endemic mustard Draba maguirei. American Journal of Botany e16138.

Related prior article:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/41425341

The taxa in this complex have different ploidy levels:

Draba maguirei subsp. maguirei n=16

Draba maguirei subsp. stonei n=8

Draba burkei  (syn. D. maguirei var. burkei) n=10

All three taxa are northern Utah endemics.  Their ranges however do not overlap.   D. burkei occus in Box Elder, Cache, Morgan (barely) and Weber Cos.   The D. maguirei subspecies only occur in Cache County with subsp. stonei occurring somewhat to the south at lower elevations than subsp. maguirei

All three have yellow flowers with oblong leaves in basal rosettes.  The flowering stems are scapose (i.e. lacking leaves).  D. maguirei plants have longer leaves than D. burkei. There are differences in leaf and fruit trichomes (hairs).   D. burkei only has trichomes along its leaf margins.  This tends to be true also with subsp. maguirei whereas subsp. stonei has trichomes on blade surfaces.   Unlike the short-stalked and usually four-rayed trichomes of subsp. maguirei, subsp.stonei mostly has 2-rayed (bifurcate) trichomes; D. burkei has unbranched trichomes. 

Draba maguirei subsp. stonei (Teresa Prendusi, May 23, 2004, Logan Canyon, Utah)

Draba maguirei subsp. stonei leaves (Teresa Prendusi, May 2004, Logan Canyon, Utah)

D. maguirei and D. burkei are both on the Forest Service's (Intermountain Region, R4) sensitive species list that has not been updated since 2010.  Both currently have G2 (Imperiled) NatureServe rankings.  They have been included in Utah Native Plant Society rare plant lists since at least 2003 on-line and have been ranked with a conservation priority of "Watch" (third highest).  These now newly recognized subspecies have not yet been ranked and their conservation priority could end up being now higher when ultimately re-reviewed.  D. maguirei was also included in the 1991 Utah Endangered, Threatened and Sensitive Plant Field Guide, so has been on the radar for a long time.

The URPG has accordingly been updated.  Utah rare plant guide links to each of these three taxa follow:

https://www.utahrareplants.org/pdf/Draba_burkei.pdf

https://www.utahrareplants.org/pdf/Draba_maguirei_subsp_maguirei.pdf

https://www.utahrareplants.org/pdf/Draba_maguirei_subsp_stonei.pdf

Supplemental page to the above:

https://www.utahrareplants.org/pdf/Draba_maguirei_subsp_stonei_supp.pdf


Note: it is coincidental that the plants in this complex have all been named for individuals* that have a last letter of "e" in their names, i.e.:  Maguire, Burke, and Stone.  These individuals were all males so hence the "i" ending in the corresponding scientific names.  

*Purely opinion: I am not a big fan of naming plants or animals after people.  A better approach is to, whenever possible, try to use either a characteristic of the plant or something that relates to where it occurs (i.e. geographic location or habitat type for example) or something else related to its biology in forming the specific or varietal epithet.  Admittedly this can also be problematic since that distinguishing character or location may end up being different than originally thought, leading to misleading names.  And that is made harder with cryptic taxa like those discussed here. Nonetheless, these are biological organisms that came into existence over a likely vast evolutionary time period, and were also known by others long before they were ever named. They deserve appropriate respect.  It is nice to honor someone who may have made a huge botanical contribution or even with simply an incidental discovery of some kind, but that person's name could just as easily be used as part of the common name (for which there are no rules when it comes to plants) if applicable, or indicated in the published write-up for the taxon.  To have a word that translates to something with respect to the plant itself is I think far more meaningful.  Naming plants after your spouse, your children, your grandchildren, your friends or colleagues, etc. (or even the person who either first recognized something as undescribed, or who collected it first even though those circumstances make more sense), to me borders on being something that is more typically inappropriate for a scientific endeavor (and despite the precedent that has been set in doing so, the one frowned upon approach is not to name something for yourself - the line is at least drawn there!).  Yet, and with all due respect, the scientific names of our native plant species are quite literally littered with the often rather meaningless names of people.









 






Saturday, February 18, 2023

Plants in the news: winter 2023

Invasive Tamarisk removal efforts:

From southern Utah, we have this recent story:

https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2023/02/10/agl-local-nonprofit-woodturners-join-forces-to-rid-southern-utah-of-invasive-very-flammable-tamarisk-tree/

Tamarisk (also known as "Saltcedar" and by the scientific name Tamarix ramosissima) is found throughout the state of Utah and not just in southern Utah.  It is a Class III ("contain") designated noxious weed in Utah, and is found in pretty much every county in the state.  In the United States, where it is not native, it is now principally found in the western-central portion of the country and then down into Mexico.  It chokes out other vegetation (and makes it very difficult to find a camping spot along rivers!).  I don't recall reading an article before that focuses on its flammability like this article does.

The power of plants:

This recent piece:

https://www.abc4.com/community/hidden-history/black-history-month/crazy-plant-bae-brings-plant-therapy-to-black-community/

quotes a study indicating that " . .  taking care of plants can aid in stress reduction, alleviate symptoms of depression, aid with memory retention, promote better self-esteem, and make us generally more productive and creative."

This article doesn't focus on locally native plants per se. But, the same idea can be applied to gardening with native plants and helping to protect ecosystems harboring our diminishing natural areas.  So often those of us working in plant conservation are grilled with the question, "Why care?" [in reference to say a rare plant or to plants in general]. While there are so many excellent responses available to this usually mind-numbing question, this response is as good as any.  They benefit us in so many ways (including the fact that we wouldn't exist without them!).

Some good news hopefully for Monarchs:

The winter Monarch count is up:

https://www.upr.org/utah-news/2023-02-06/monarch-butterfly-winter-count-shows-significant-improvement

By no means does this mean that Monarchs are out of the woods and all ongoing efforts must continue at warp speed. Monarch caterpillars only feed on milkweed species and so there is an incredibly important connection between Monarch species survival and native plants (and the adults who require nectar from flowering plants, preferably locally adapted native plants).  Attempting to do as many things as possible to conserve Monarch butterflies is not a recent phenomenon.  Scientists have been concerned about them for decades.  They have been the poster child for the Union of Concern Scientists for a very long time.  But, as with climate change, people were just largely not paying attention to their plight until relatively recently.  Crisis management is how we respond to environmental issues.


Utah Legislature Tackles Wasteful Grass:


Utah is extremely wasteful of its water resources and there needs to be a much bigger push with significant private landowner incentives to replace lawn grass.  And, in fact, until relatively recently, in many homeowner associations and related neighborhood settings, owners were persecuted when trying to implement water-saving landscapes.  An about-face is slowly starting to happen. 

Using the desperate condition of the Great Salt Lake to address our poor water use practices is I suppose fine, but I agree with a quote in this article that it will not be enough by itself to save the lake.  Golf courses should not be exempted from the legislation that is being currently discussed (but through lobbying efforts, which essentially corrupt good governance throughout our democracy, no doubt will lead to their exclusion). 

Meanwhile, an encouraging development from last year that contradicts the long-held notion that front yards with native plants are just a bunch of weeds and must be immediately removed, is this change in Utah's Condominum Act which took effect on May 4, 2022.  Some background:

Here's a link to the new Utah law:

https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title57/Chapter8A/57-8a-S231.html?v=C57-8a-S231_2022050420220504

Note from the above that now (Section 57-8a-231):

"(2) An association may not enact or enforce a governing document that prohibits, or has the effect of prohibiting, a lot owner of a detached dwelling from  incorporating water-wise landscaping on the property owner's property."

Nice!

There is in addition to the above section, another reference to landscaping (under Section 57-8-8.1, also effective May 4, 2022 of the Condominium Ownership Act):

"(9) An association of unit owners:

(a) shall adopt rules supporting water-efficient landscaping, including allowance for low water use on lawns during drought conditions; and

(b) may not prohibit or restrict the conversion of a grass park strip to water-efficient landscaping."

See:

https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title57/Chapter8/57-8-S8.1.html?v=C57-8-S8.1_2022050420220504

In a country and particularly in a state that seems to be largely headed backwards towards a less enlightened time, this is a refreshing change in attitude (even if it is happening over the fear of the looming ecological catastrophe, severe human health impacts, and the impact to Utah's ski and therefore tourism industry, that would be the end result of a non-existent Great Salt Lake).

Elks eat Yews and die:

We plant a lot of biological garbage in our yards and then we essentially block wildlife from lower elevation areas where for thousands of years they migrated during the winter.  And now they end up being forced to eat whatever they can find in the foothills (instead of the valleys).

https://kjzz.com/news/local/19-elk-found-dead-in-utah-county-likely-from-plant-poisoning-wildlife-utah-yew-landscaping-animals-dwr

Yews (Taxus, a genus of coniferous shrubs and trees) have no place in Utah landscapes.  Both Taxus baccata and the even more poisonous Taxus cuspida have nonetheless been sold in the nursery trade in Utah (and culvitated on both the University of Utah and BYU campuses since at least the 1950's) and are sometimes used as a hedge or border wall.  One of these species is believed to be responsible for the death of these elk.

Yew poisoning is well known.  For some references see:

https://extension.psu.edu/toxicity-of-yew-wood-and-roots

My recommendation:  don't plant Yews!  And "yank the yews" if you have them already in your yard.