NPS's I&M division on the DOGE chopping block

The National Park Service's (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring Division (I&M) is headed for a DOGE reduction or elimination in its entirety.

The I&M division provides scientific data that is critical for park management.  It helps to ensure that the parks remain healthy and are meeting their conservation objectives.

This May 2025 article concerning the federally listed Navajo Sedge (Carex specuicola):

https://www.nps.gov/articles/protecting-navajo-sedge-in-natural-bridges.htm

was authored by an I&M research scientist and the related work was done by experienced I&M staffers along with Natural Bridges National Monument staff.

More about the I&M division:

https://www.nps.gov/im/index.htm

DOGE has been illegally in control of the NPS since April of 2025.

Related articles:

Elon Musk's DOGE is now running America's national parks (April 21, 2025)

https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/doge-running-national-parks-20287023.php

DOGE now in control of the National Park Service (April 23,2025):

https://www.travelpulse.com/news/impacting-travel/doge-now-in-control-of-the-national-park-service-what-we-know

DOGE Is Now in Charge of U.S. National Parks (April 24, 2025)

https://www.fodors.com/news/news/national-parks-will-now-be-run-by-elon-musks-doge

Navajo Sedge information

Utah Rare Plants website:

https://www.utahrareplants.org/pdf/Carex_specuicola.pdf

ECOS:

https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8579

Provo recognizes the critical importance of native pollinators

Provo is the first city in Utah to join the Bee City USA initiative which focuses on native pollinator  education and conservation.

BYU student newspaper article:

https://universe.byu.edu/metro/provo-joins-bee-city-usa-as-first-in-utah-to-boost-pollinator-conservation

More information

Bee City USA (an initiative of the Xerces Society) website:

https://beecityusa.org/

Xerces website:

https://xerces.org/

Related:  

Project 1100 (based in Utah) website:

https://www.projectelevenhundred.org/

Note: Project 1100 is named in honor of the some 1100 species of native bees found so far in Utah.  While Utah is known as the "honeybee state" and has a state flag that utilizes a fanciful beehive graphic, honeybees are not native bees and hive placement (among other impacts) can have a seriously negative impact on our native bees. Utah's native flora (which includes some 3,000 vascular plant species alone) evolved alongside native bees (and other pollinators, but bees typically have been the most significant) and not honeybees.   And without plants, we would not exist.

ESA protection for two Joshua Tree species required to be reanalyzed

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has been ordered to reanalyze climate change threats to  the Western and Eastern Joshua Tree species.  Endangered Species Act (ESA) designations as threatened species was previously denied.

Related links:

https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2025/05/15/joshua-tree-protection-ruling/83658422007/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/federal-court-rules-attempt-withhold-endangered-species-act/story?id=121792589

https://wildearthguardians.org/press-releases/federal-court-sides-with-conservationists-joshua-tree-analysis-unlawfully-sidesteps-climate-science/

https://wildearthguardians.org/brave-new-wild/where-we-work/arizona/inside-the-courtroom-legal-fellow-casey-bage-wins-for-wildlife/

"The court emphasized the need for the FWS to adequately address the threats posed by climate change, including prolonged droughts, increasing fire, and habitat loss, to the Joshua tree."

There are two separate species involved.  The species that occurs in the southwestern corner of Utah is the Eastern Joshua Tree, Yucca jaegeriana, and not Yucca brevifolia (which does not actually occur in Utah as was historically thought).  In Utah Y. jaegeriana is considered to be criticially imperiled (S1) at the NatureServe state ranking level.   The two species may appear superficially to be similar in appearance but they have different growth habits, different leaf lengths, different pollinators, and different fruit and flower morphologies.  Y. jaegeriana is for example generally not as tall and is branched compared to the taller, unbranched Y. brevifolia.  

Y. jaegeriana in Utah solely occurs in Washington County extending to western Arizona and  then from southeastern to southwestern Nevada and then slipping just over the border into southeastern California.  Y. brevifolia also occurs in Nevada but farther to north in southwestern Nevada and then extending more into the interior of southeastern California.  While there is an area where they meet, they are mostly not sympatric.

Both species are highly threatened by climate change, wildfires, habitat loss and invasive species.

Some journal references and related links:

Recognition of Y. jaegeriana as a species in 2007:

https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1050&context=aliso#:~:text=Yucca%20brevifolia%20s.s.%20is%20arborescent,5).

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ecology-and-evolution/articles/10.3389/fevo.2023.1266892/full

In July of 2023 California passed the Western Joshua Tree Conservation Act to conserve western Joshua tree and its habitat 

https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Environmental-Review/WJT

Yucca jaegeriana in Mohave Co AZ 4/25/1986 (Tony Frates photo)

Honey bee apiaries on public lands and in natural areas

Some references relating to concerns about honey bees especially when apiaries are placed on public lands or in/near natural areas follow:

Commercial honeybees threaten to displace Utah’s native bees

Nick Bowlin March 7, 2019, High Country News

https://www.hcn.org/issues/51-5/public-lands-commercial-honeybees-threaten-to-displace-utahs-native-bees-pesticides/

Fighting for Flowers: Native Bee Conservation and the Dangers of Honeybee Permitting on Public Lands 

Thomas Meinzen, Grand Canyon Trust, March 2020 presentation

https://www.unps.org/miscpdf/MeinzenProtectBeesMarch2020.pdf

Will Putting Honey Bees on Public Lands Threaten Native Bees?

https://e360.yale.edu/features/will-putting-honey-bees-on-public-lands-threaten-native-bees

by Jennifer Oldhamd, September 15, 2020, Yale Environment 360 (published by the Yale School of the Environment)

Article quotations:

As suitable sites become scarce, commercial beekeepers are increasingly moving their hives to U.S. public lands. But scientists warn that the millions of introduced honey bees pose a risk to native species, outcompeting them for pollen and altering fragile plant communities.

“There are no feral honey bees in Utah — the winters are too long and cold,” Cane said. “This is essentially the most intact native bee fauna in the U.S. It’s worth protecting.”

 

Environmental groups want to block honeybees from Utah’s national forests

By Brian Maffly,  Aug. 23, 2020, Salt Lake Tribune

https://www.sltrib.com/news/environment/2020/08/23/environmental-groups-want/

 

Investigating Imperiled Bumble Bee Species Distributions and Habitat Associations

Oct 1, 2023  to Jan 30, 2026, USDA Research Project:

https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/project/?accnNo=445663

Bumble bees are critically important pollinators for wild plants and agricultural crop production, but are declining globally. Bumble bee population declines have been attributed to several interacting stressors, including land-use alteration and climate change. 

Project 1100 

Various articles from 2019 to 2021 including:

Why Honey Bee Apiaries Should Never Be Permitted On National Public Lands by Vincent Tepedino (2019).

https://www.projectelevenhundred.org/the-science

Xerces

An Overview of the Potential Impacts of Honey Bees to Native Bees, Plant Communities, and Ecosystems in Wild Landscapes:  Recommendations for Land Managers

https://xerces.org/sites/default/files/2018-06/16-067_02_Overview%20of%20the%20Potential%20Impacts%20of%20Honey%20Bees_web.pdf

Comment: contains many recommendations with respect to the placement of apiaries on public lands and natural areas.

Citation:

Hatfield, R. G., S. Jepsen, M.Vaughan, S. Black, E. LeeMäder. 2018. An Overview of the Potential Impacts of Honey Bees to Native Bees, Plant Communities, and Ecosystems in Wild Landscapes: Recommendations for Land Managers. 12 pp. Portland, OR: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation.

Want To Save The Bees? Focus On Habitat, Not Honey Bees

By Rich Hatfield and Matthew Shepherd on 6. July 2023

https://xerces.org/blog/want-to-save-bees-focus-on-habitat-not-honey-bees

Honey Bees in North America: Why Getting a Hive Won’t “Save the Bees”

by Rich Hatfield and Matthew  Shepherd (Xerces), 2023

https://xerces.org/sites/default/files/publications/22-011.pdf

 

Why preserve the natural world?

This question is closely related to the "Why care?" question that arises when talking about why we should avoid causing plant species to become extinct.

How about this:  We exist because of plants.  The very air that we breathe is because of plants.  They sustain us and shelter us.  Yet we give them so very little respect.

A February 15, 2024 World Economic Forum report provides even more logical reasons such as:  half of the world's GDP is dependent on nature.   Yet we are likely losing species due to rapid habitat loss without even realizing it.  Kew estimates that there may be as many as 100,000 unnamed plant species over and above the roughly 400,000 that are known.

Preserving the natural world is critical to our very survival as well as our economic well-being. It should be our highest priority.  Without it, we have nothing.

Valley fever spread is a reflection of global warming

In 2021, a University of Utah Health article noted that "Valley Fever," a fungal disease more commonly associated with California and Arizona might in fact be more common in Utah than has been thought:

https://healthcare.utah.edu/press-releases/2021/09/valley-fever-more-common-utah-previously-thought-researchers-find

From the article:

"Valley Fever is caused by Coccidioides, a fungus that can infect the lungs. The fungus lives in the soil but becomes airborne when dust is disturbed, such as by construction or high winds. If people inhale that dust, they can become infected, but the disease isn't contagious from person to person."

"With climate change, temperatures are increasing," says Adrienne Carey, M.D., infectious disease specialist at U of U Health. "With increased temperatures and drier conditions, the map will change, and it should probably be expected to spread northward. Aside from a highly publicized outbreak in 2001 at Dinosaur National Monument, there really is a lack of data about how common Valley Fever is within the state of Utah."

"The team identified 364 cases of Valley Fever that occurred between 2009-2015 and met the research criteria for "proven" or "probable" Coccidioides infection."

"Interestingly, one of the fastest-growing cities in the United States, St. George, is in southwestern Utah," Carey points out. "With the rapid growth of construction that's occurring, there's increased risk for people to come in contact with the fungus."

"People who are potentially vulnerable might consider wearing masks to protect themselves from inhaling the fungus spores, particularly in dusty or windy conditions or while participating in outdoor recreation."

A more recent NBC health news article published in January of 2023 projects that the disease may present throughout the entire western US over the next 70 years.  Maps contained in the article show its current presence in Utah:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/valley-fever-historically-found-only-southwest-spreading-can-devastati-rcna64313

This article further reinforces that Valley fever cases are on the rise and will likely continue to worsen as a result of "climate change."

UDWR acknowledges the importance of the ESA but also wants police to kill urban deer

Importance of the Endangered Species Act acknowledged by UDWR:

The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) has been devoting itself to delisting plant (and animal) species formally listed under the very important Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) and has not ever to my knowledge ever supported new listings. Quite the reverse.

Yet in a news report piece published on December 27, 2023 with respect to the 50th anniversary of the ESA, a UDWR representative acknowledges that the Act has  "has prevented the extinction of hundreds of [imperiled] species" and that it has also helped "promote the recovery of many species that were near extinction."

This is a great but is also a rather shocking acknowledgment by an agency that has done nothing but pushback against and complain about the ESA, and that has embarked on an ambitious statewide program of introducing non-native mountain goats that are negatively impacting high-elevation ecosystems, and an agency that has traditionally opposed the protection of wolves despite the science that indicates the very important role they play.

The piece goes on to mention the 17 wildlife species currently listed under the ESA that occur in Utah.  Yet there is no mention of the currently 25 listed plant species that also occur in Utah.  The importance of plant species in general is never given the attention that they deserve.  We would not exist without them, nor would any wildlife.  Healthy and diverse ecosystems rely on healthy native plant populations.

Related stories re: the 50th anniversary of the ESA:

https://www.upr.org/2023-12-24/the-endangered-species-act-turns-50

https://www.upr.org/2023-12-24/the-santa-cruz-island-dudleya-is-an-endangered-species-act-success-story

https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/publications/earthonline/endangered-earth-online-no1225.html

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/01/02/2023-28935/50th-anniversary-of-the-endangered-species-act-2023

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/money-endangered-species-goes-small-number-creatures-leaving-others-li-rcna131680

(this last reference discusses the plight of plants that are typically short-changed)

UDWR and urban deer:

As a curiosity completely unrelated to the above, the same UDWR representative on the same date and in another news report indicates that the UDWR has "authorized" city police to "cull" urban deer.  So much for the sanctity of wildlife.  We are living in their habitat, not the other way around.  If they are bothering someone's flower garden (but in winter, they are just looking for something to browse, mainly grass) that really doesn't justify killing them.  That they can cause accidents is true but normally that is because drivers tend to drive too fast and don't pay attention. Somehow we do have to find a way to live with the natural world and not do what we do best (i.e. kill anything that moves, and destroy natural open spaces).  That we have failed to give them corridors to areas where they should be able to freely roam in an attempt to survive is our fault, not theirs. There is also considerable concern about the risk of someone being shot with a bullet or an arrow while attempts are made to cull herds.  Police officers are not trained wildlife hunters or trappers.  City police should not take on this responsibility that UDWR has "authorized" (which likely also exceeds UDWR's authority).